I am a behavioral economist studying applied micro questions in fields such as education, development, and family economics. In my research, I examine social influences on individual behavior and beliefs around big life decisions such as career or fertility choices and explore their potential consequences for society-wide outcomes such as intergenerational transmission and social mobility.
I am an Assistant Professor at the Toulouse School of Economics and a CESifo Research Network Affiliate. I completed my PhD in Economics at UC Berkeley in May 2022 and spent one year as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the briq Institute on Behavior & Inequality from August 2022 to August 2023. Prior to my PhD, I obtained an M.Phil. in Economics from the University of Oxford and a B.Sc. in Economics from the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich. You can find my CV here.
If you have comments, thoughts, ideas or questions related to my research, don't hesitate to reach out!
Parental Pressure and Intergenerational Mobility in Education (pdf)
High school graduates in Germany who lack parents with college experience are 40 percentage points less likely to attend college than those with college-educated parents. This study provides evidence that parental influence explains a significant portion of this socio-economic gap through at least two channels: one, parental pressure and two, the intergenerational transmission of beliefs and preferences. To understand parental influence, I conduct a field experiment with 2,065 students and parents in Germany. Importantly, I experimentally make students' stated college plans visible to parents. In the first finding, visibility to parents doubles the socio-economic gap in college plans to 26 percentage points. This is mainly driven by an increase in college plans among students with college-educated parents. Furthermore, students' stated plans are more predictive of eventual choices when they are visible to parents than when they are not. This implies that perceived parental expectations not only influence stated plans, but likely also ultimate decisions. To disentangle mechanisms, I collect detailed survey data on students' and parents' subjective expectations for various career tracks and estimate a structural model of career choice under uncertainty. Model simulations indicate that 45% of the socio-economic gap in college plans is explained by parental pressure and 51% by students internalizing family-specific beliefs and preferences.
Selective Memory around Big Life Decisions [pdf]
Selective memory can lead people to mistake life outcomes as what they always wanted. Using data on past fertility desires from a panel tracking fertility preferences and actual fertility for 3,936 Kenyans from their early twenties to their thirties, I provide monetary incentives to remember and to be reminded of past desires. I find that: (i) 29% of respondents have more children by their thirties than once desired; (ii) despite incentives, especially respondents with excess fertility misremember past desires in the direction of current fertility and do not want to be reminded of them, consistent with motivated memory; (iii) selective memory affects the intergenerational transmission of fertility preferences.
Coverage: Roland Bénabou's 2021 Jean-Jacques Laffont Prize lecture on "Beliefs and Misbeliefs: The Economics of Wishful Thinking", video here (1:04:24 to 1:09:40)
Abstract: Fertility preferences have long played a key role in models of fertility differentials and change. We examine the stability of preferences over time using rich panel data on Kenyan women’s fertility desires, expectations, actual fertility, and recall of desires in three waves over a nine-year period, when respondents were in their 20s. We find that although desired fertility is quite unstable, most women perceive their desires to be stable. Under hypothetical future scenarios, few expect their desired fertility to increase over time but, in fact, such increases in fertility desires are common. Moreover, when asked to recall past desires, most respondents report previously wanting exactly as many children as they desire today. These patterns of bias are consistent with the emerging view that fertility desires are contextual, emotionally laden, and structured by identity.
Work in Progress
Abstract: This paper examines how beliefs and preferences drive identity-conforming consumption or investments. We propose a theory where identity distorts individuals' beliefs about potential outcomes and imposes psychic costs on identity-incongruent consumption. We substantiate our theoretical foundation through two large-scale field experiments on soccer betting in Kenya and the UK, where participants had established affiliations with the teams involved versus situations where they assumed a neutral stance. The results indicate that soccer fans have overoptimistic beliefs about match outcomes that align with their identity, betting significantly more on those than on games with neutral outcomes. After accounting for individuals' beliefs and risk preferences, our structural estimates reveal that participants undervalue gains from identity-incongruent assets by 11% to 27%. Moreover, our counterfactual simulations imply that identity-specific beliefs account for 25% to 50% of the investment differences between neutral observers and supporters, and the remainder is due to identity preferences.